Muslim appeasement has crippled India

[sahastrabhuj]

Muslim appeasement has crippled India

Thanks to UPA government’s policy of soft borders, Pak-Bangla nationals are infiltrating into India every-day changing the demographic map of various states in the country. And even before perpetrators of 1993 bomb blasts in Mumbai could be punished, Mumbai faced fresh blasts on July 11, 2006 in trains which claimed about two hundred lives.
By J.G. Arora

Genocide and eviction of Hindus from Kashmir to be made refugees in their own country; frequent Pak-Bangla sponsored terrorist attacks on security forces, civilians and temples; continuation of Article 370 conferring a special status on Muslim majority Jammu and Kashmir; infiltration of crores of Pak-Bangla nationals into India to create one more Islamic country on Indian soil represent the bitter harvest of this suicidal appeasement.

Congress government under Jawaharlal Nehru started “Haj subsidy” for Muslims in 1959 though such subsidy is anti-secular and though none of the 57 Muslim countries pays any such subsidy.

A large majority of Indian Muslims who demanded Pakistan for Muslims and exchange of population on creation of Pakistan stayed back in India, and did not go to Pakistan.

Sir Winston Churchill said, “An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last”. Though India is being devoured bit by bit every day by its tormentors, India continues to appease them. Poisonous politics of appeasement has crippled India and ravaged its body and soul.

Genocide and eviction of Hindus from Kashmir to be made refugees in their own country; frequent Pak-Bangla sponsored terrorist attacks on security forces, civilians and temples; continuation of Article 370 conferring a special status on Muslim majority Jammu and Kashmir; infiltration of crores of Pak-Bangla nationals into India to create one more Islamic country on Indian soil represent the bitter harvest of this suicidal appeasement.

Long legacy
This hideous policy of appeasement started in 1921 when Mahatma Gandhi and Congress Party’s support to Indian Muslims’ demand for Khilafat (to install Sultan of Turkey as the Caliph) led to Moplah rebellion in 1921 in Malabar in which thousands of innocent Hindus were massacred by Muslims. And Hindus had nothing to do with British policy towards Turkey. Sir C. Sankaran Nair (1857-1934), a former judge of Madras High Court has described horrors of Moplah rebellion in his book “Gandhi and Anarchy”. But Mahatma Gandhi reportedly described Moplahs as “God fearing,” who “are fighting for what they consider as religion, and in a manner they are considered as religious.”

Persistent appeasement philosophy of Congress culminated in the Muslim League demanding Pakistan for Muslims in March, 1940, and creation of Pakistan in 1947 and eviction of Hindus and Sikhs from present-day Pakistan and Bangladesh. But even after 1947, the same doctrine has guided successive Congress governments’ actions. Only a few illustrations of such countless actions are given here. Congress government under Jawaharlal Nehru started “Haj subsidy” for Muslims in 1959 though such subsidy is anti-secular and though none of the 57 Muslim countries pays any such subsidy. And to placate Muslim uproar over Supreme Court’s judgement in Shah Bano’s case, the then Congress government passed the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 and nullified the said judgement. And the same Congress which had rejected “Communal Award” in 1932 is now spearheading Muslim reservation in government jobs; and is sharing power with Muslim League which had demanded and got Pakistan. Besides, debunking nation’s security, after regaining power in 2004, Congress government repealed Prevention of Terrorist Activities Act (POTA) the way it had repealed Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) in 1995. Besides, to please pro-Pakistan elements, UPA government is planning to withdraw security forces from Kashmir. But the most vexatious outcome of this capitulation is the demographic and terrorist invasion of India.

Demographic and terrorist invasion
In their bid to demolish and dismember India, Pakistan’s Inter Services Intelligence, and its Bangladeshi counterpart are bent upon creating one more Islamic country on Indian soil for which they have illegally sent crores of their nationals into India.

AASU leader Sarbananda Sonowal took the issue of Bangladeshi infiltration to Supreme Court. By its judgement dated July 12, 2005, Supreme Court struck down the Illegal Migrants (Determination by Tribunals) Act, 1983 as unconstitutional; and termed Bangladeshi infiltration as “external aggression” and directed that “the Bangladesh nationals who have illegally crossed the border and have trespassed into Assam or are living in other parts of the country have no legal right of any kind to remain in India and they are liable to be deported.”

But instead of deporting the infiltrators, on Feb. 10, 2006, UPA government brought in the Foreigners (Tribunals for Assam) Order to nullify the Apex Court’s judgement. However, on December 5, 2006, Supreme Court quashed this Order also as illegal and unconstitutional, and called for a strict implementation of its earlier judgement dated July 12, 2005 “so as to ensure that illegal immigrants are sent out of this country.” Shockingly, despite the Supreme Court’s clear directions, no infiltrators have been deported by the government.

Rather, thanks to UPA government’s policy of soft borders, Pak-Bangla nationals are infiltrating into India every day changing the demographic map of various States in the country. And even before perpetrators of 1993 bomb blasts in Mumbai could be punished, Mumbai faced fresh blasts on July 11, 2006 in trains which claimed about two hundred lives. And these attacks are in the long line of attacks Bharat has suffered since Muhammad bin Qasim’s Arab army’s attack in 711. And such attacks continue to hammer India due to government’s terrorist-friendly approach.

‘Settlement’ as against ‘appeasement’
Immediately after Muslim League demanded Pakistan for Muslims and exchange of population in March 1940, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar wrote his book “Thoughts on Pakistan” in which he criticised the Congress policy of ‘appeasement’ of Muslims, and advocated the policy of ‘settlement’. As per Dr. Ambedkar, ‘appeasement’ sets no limits to the demands of aggressor. ‘Settlement’ does. Besides, appeasement increases aggressor’s aggression. Accordingly, Dr. Ambedkar held that as a ‘settlement’, creation of Pakistan would end constant appeasement.

Besides, as a ‘settlement’ of Hindu-Muslim conflict, Dr. Ambedkar suggested that exchange of Hindu-Muslim population must accompany partition of India. But despite Dr. Ambedkar’s counsel against appeasement, Congress kept on pursuing appeasement. In the 1945-46 elections, Muslims voted for the creation of Pakistan. And despite conceding Pakistan in 1947, Congress continues to cling to its policy of appeasement.

A large majority of Indian Muslims who demanded Pakistan for Muslims and exchange of population on creation of Pakistan stayed back in India, and did not go to Pakistan. But with the creation of Pakistan in 1947, it was the permanent settlement of Hindu-Muslim problem in the sub-continent. Accordingly, appeasement must come to an end.

Now or never
Because of its surrender and inaction, India is being taken over by crores of Pak-Bangla infiltrators silently. Besides, countless Pak-Bangla terrorists are stalking all over India to strike at the time and target of their choice.

Since drastic situations demand drastic remedies, all nationalist organisations and individuals must come together and force the government to act as follows: (a) Terrorists must be crushed; not welcomed and embraced. Chanakya Neeti as also Sun-tzu’s Art of War, and countless lessons of world history emphasise the crushing of enemies before enemies crush us. (b) Let infiltrators be treated as invaders, And not as vote banks. (c) Let Indian borders be sealed to prevent infiltrators from entering India. (d) Let all Indo-Pak and Indo-Bangla road and rail journeys be discontinued. (e) Let the Supreme Court’s judgements be implemented, and crores of Pak-Bangla infiltrators be deported. And their daily influx be curbed. (f) And let Pak-Bangla design to destroy India and plant one more Islamic country on Indian soil be defeated.

Here, it is relevant to quote Sir Winston Churchill who deprecated the British policy of appeasement of Germany before outbreak of Second World War thus, “Still, if you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a small chance of survival.”

The writer is a retired Chief Commissioner of Income Tax

[purushottam]

welcome to your letter. The basic thing is it is appeasement of minority and reservation class and in particular Muslims. I will try to writ more if possible. How ever I share with your views. Thanks for frank and fair writing.

[purushottam]

So long as Hindus do not unite and leave the mentality of appeasement of Muslims we cannot do any thing. It is only for remaining in power politicians appease Muslims and they have slipped India and in future they will make India a Muslim country.

[S.P. Attri]

HAZRAT MOHAMMAD, THE FIERY-EMBER OF ISLAM
By S.P. Attri (USA )
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. We Hindus have been the victims of, the fiendish deeds of Islamic Jehadis, we
have suffered the chaos and calamity that they brought, into India during the
last 1200 plus years. It is a sickening tale of unmitigated barbarism and
brutality of the Moslem on the Hindu victim, who was labeled as a Kafir ( a
Non-Moslem Infidel ). We Hindus who have been messed up for 1200 years ( messed
up enough not to eradicate this plague of Islam for 1200 years ), cannot afford
to make another mistake now. We absolutely must abandon our long pig-headed ways
of ignoring the grim and satanic threat from Islam ( as well as Christianity ),
and resolutely take on the task of tearing up Islam ( as well as Christianity ),
and catapulting it completely out of India.
2. We Hindus must resolve not to allow the Junk-Ideologies of Islam and
Christianity, to thrive and fatten inside India. Nothing less nor limited than this can be acceptable to the Kafir-Hindu, who has been
beaten, brutalized, murdered, robbed, and humiliated by both Islam and
Christianity. We must fortify our Vedic-Guard and successfully preserve and
protect our sacred Hinduism, expel the barbarians of Islam who came from Arabia,
who murdered our Hindus, and through the process of persecution, made the Hindu
perish, and dwindle in numbers and strength, in Moslem’s attempt to make the
Kafir-Hindu extinct. This calculation suffers from an underestimation rather
than an exaggeration, because lots of Hindus converted to Islam, to escape the
persecution and brutality of the Moslem upon the Hindu.
3. We must make it our sacred duty, in Dharmic parlance, to save the land of the
Hindu. Without Hinduism, there is no Indian culture, and for this the survival
of the Hindu is a must. We must strike at the fanatic and frenzied fangs of
Islam, and break their will to fight and subdue the Kafir ( Non-Moslem Infidels
). We must not allow them to shamelessly misrepresent Islam as a religion of peace, love, and brotherhood.,
when in fact the despicable followers of Islam, maintain the wildest and
un-restrained ferocity of Jehad. In the years, since the start of Hazrat
Mohammad’s jehad, an unward spiral of barbarism, has engulfed the land of the
Kafir-Hindu. The Kafir-Hindu has taken plenty of colossal beating. We Hindus
only disgrace our Hinduism, if we do not take any action, for the survival of
the Hindu, and the elimination of the Junk-Ideologies of Islam and Christianity,
from India.
4. The ruffian, Hazrat Mohammad was the real fiery-ember, behind the turning of
his Moslems against the Kafirs ( Non-Moslem Infidels ) of the world. Hazrat
Mohammad was the spark who ignited the murder-plot of Islam, to finally and
permanently eliminate the Kafirs from this world. He was the trigger-man, and
can be clearly connected and established as the Kafir-Murderor. He was mentally
ill and the savagery of his insanity and derangement, must be exposed and
consummately demolished.
Surinder Paul Attri

[S.P. Attri]

Subj: Islam strikes in Hyderabad

1. This is not the first time that Islam has struck, nor it is going to be the last time that, Islam is going to strike. Islam is always looking for soft places to strike. And who is softer than the UPA government of India, whose modus operandi is political correctness. Consequently, under its watch, it is much more important for the security agencies, to be nice to the minorities than to be effective in terrorism-control. The phoney-liberal politicians of the UPA government want to be elected, and to be re-elected.

2. Let no Hindu be fooled or perplexed by the announcement of, tightening security across the state of Andhra Pradesh. The heinous and barbaric attacks of terrorist-Sullas are not going to stop, they shall continue. Why ?
Because, the overall policies of Andhra Pradesh government and of the UPA government, are soft approaches towards terrorists, which invoke and invite terrorism. The phoney-liberal politicians of the UPA government are wearing blind-folds, they are unable to see the seriousness and gravity of terrorism, and the challenges that it puts in place, against India. It is damn ignorance of the phoney-liberal politicians of India, all the way through, from beginning to end.

3. The Hindu society has been facing ideological aggression from Islam, for 1200 years plus. During these twelve centuries, Islam has staged repeated rounds of attacks, slaughter, destruction, pillage, and plunder against the Kafir-Hindu. Hindus have suffered colossal loss of population, territory, property, and dignity. This kind of aggressive character of Islam, does not register in the awareness of the phoney-liberal politicians of India, whose priority is getting elected, everything else gets side-lined. These vote-hungry, sloganised, myopic politicians, destroy the morale of the Hindu, and weaken the Hindu society, as well as the security of the country of India.

4. Hindu will have to organize his own defense, using his own areas of strength. Hindu cannot and should not rely upon the Phoney-Liberal politicians, to either defend his life, or his property. The primary task of Hinduism Defense, has to be shouldered by the Hindu himself. And the true character of the aggressive character of Islamic ( and Christian ) ideology, and the true character of the phoney-liberal politicians, must be thoroughly exposed.

Surinder Paul Attri

[purushottam]

with curtsay of the writer and the central chronical.


Dangerous move
The decision taken by the Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh- YS Rajashekhar Reddy- on waiving the fee of Muslim students in graduate courses- such as Engineering, Medical and law- is extremely dangerous- and will not stand test in the court of law.
This decision is a typical example of how Hindus have been reduced to second-class citizens in their own country and of appeasement of minorities. Such a move may also result in conversions of people from Hinduism to Islam to get the benefit of fee-waiver.

Students in college can see that their fellow colleagues do not have to pay fees- no matter what their financial position while they have to pay the full fees- simply because the other pupil is a Muslim. The fee-waiver scheme should be on the basis of economic- and not religious criteria.

One of my own friends in Nagpur wanted to do Engineering- but could not do so owing to economic problems. If he was living in Andhra Pradesh- should he have converted to Islam to get fee-waiver and do his Engineering?

The government spending so much money on a scheme which is clearly for the purpose of vote-bank politics is a bad thing. What is equally astonishing is the stony silence that the BJP has maintained on this issue.

It is only for the courts to throw out such divisive schemes and condemn the politicians who are out to divide the society.

Manmath Deshpande, Nagpur